Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Biological Series

Advanced search

The study of morphometric and the number of biochemical characteristics of the salt-resistant plastomic mutant “SR-3” of mustard plants and its parental variety “Donskaya-5”

https://doi.org/10.29235/1029-8940-2021-66-1-7-16

Abstract

It was shown that the plastome mutation induced by nitrosomethylurea and resulting in the formation of salt tolerant mustard plants of the “SR3” line improved the germination of the mutant seeds and seedlings growth both under water conditions and NaCl salinisation compared to the parent variety “Donskaya-5”. At low and medium salt concentrations (20, 50 and 100 mM) stimulation of seedling growth was noted in both forms of mustard, more pronounced in mutant plants which also contaned a lower amount of reactive oxygen species compared to “Donskaya-5”. In this conditions in both forms of plants it was detected a significant decrease of proline content in comparison with seedlings grown on water with the most difference between control and experimental plants of the line SR3. It was noted a negative effect of higher salt concentrations (150, 200, and 250 mM) on the seedlings growth of both mustard forms with a lesser negative effect of 150 mM salt on the growth of mutant plants. An increase in the salt concentration to 150, 200 and 250 mM NaCl led also to a gradual increase in the proline content, which occurs at a faster rate in the plants of “SR3” line, and ultimately led to a maximum proline content in this variant (718 µg/g of fresh weight) and 404 µg/g of fresh weight in plants of the cultivar “Donskaya-5” at 250 mM NaCl. Under salinization with 100 and 250 mM salt, the ability of SR3 mustard plants to accumulate ALA was significantly higher than in “Donskaya-5” plants by 2.6 and 1.5 times respectively. A high ability of the salt tolerant mutant plants to accumulate ALA was also noted when seedlings were grown under normal conditions in the absence of NaCl (3.8 times higher than in the case of the “Donskaya-5” variety). This supports our earlier assumption that high ability of plants to produce ALA under normal conditions may serve as an indicator of their high stress resistance when exposed to stress.

About the Authors

N. G. Averina
Institute of Biophysics and Cell Engineering, National Academy of Sciences
Belarus

Natalia G. Averina - D. Sc. (Biol.), Professor, Chief Researcher.

27, Akademicheskaya Str., 220072, Minsk



I. A. Dremuk
Institute of Biophysics and Cell Engineering, National Academy of Sciences
Belarus

Irina A. Dremuk - Ph. D. (Biol.), Researcher.

27, Akademicheskaya Str., 220072, Minsk


A. V. Usatov
Southern Federal University; Institute of Biophysics and Cell Engineering, National Academy of Sciences
Belarus

Alexandr V. Usatov - D. Sc. (Biol.), ProfessorSFU.

105/42, Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., 344006, Rostov-on-Don



References

1. Papenbrock J., Mock H.-P., Kruse E., Grimm B. Expression studies in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. Inverse maxima of magnesium chelatase and ferrochelatase activity during cyclic photoperiods. Planta, 1999, vol. 208, no. 2, рр. 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050558

2. Sopori S. K. The influence of light and abiotic stress factors on the expression of plant genes. Genetic approaches to creating plants resistant to soil salinization. Fotobiologiya rastenii i fotosintez [Plant photobiology and photosynthesis]. Minsk, 2004, pp. 29-65 (in Russian).

3. Parida A. K., Das A. B. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2005, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 324-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010

4. Ingram J., Bartels D. The molecular basis of cellular dehydration tolerance in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1996, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 377-403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.377

5. Bray E. A. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science, 1997, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(97)82562-9

6. Usatov A. I., Fedorenko G. M., Shcherbakova L. B., Mashkina E. V. Ultrastructure of chloroplasts of mustard Brassica junceae as an indicator of salt resistance. Tsitologiya [Cytology], 2004, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1035-1042 (in Russian).

7. Markin N. V., Usatov A. I., Fedorenko G. M. RAPD analysis of the genotypes of salt-resistant forms of mustard Brassica junceae L. Ekologicheskii vestnik nauchnykh tsentrov Chernomorskogo ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva [Ecological bulletin of scientific centers of the Black Sea Economic Commonwealth], 2006, no. 3, pp. 99-192 (in Russian).

8. Shemin D. Delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydrase from Rhodopseudomonas spheroids. Methods in Enzymology, 1962, vol. 5, pp. 883-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(62)05333-1

9. Soliman E. F., W. Jr. Slikker, S. F. Ali. Manganese-induced oxidative stress as measured by a fluorescent probe: an in vitro study. Neuroscience Research Communications, 1995, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 185-193.

10. Misra N., Gupta A. K. Effect of salt stress on proline metabolism in two high yielding genotypes of green gram. Plant Science, 2005, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.013

11. Zemlyanukhina O. A., Kalayev V. N., Voronina V. S. Growth and development of weigela plants of the blooming “Variegat” in an in vitro culture under conditions of salt stress. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education], 2016, no. 6. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=26019 (accessed 31.03.2020) (in Russian).

12. Kuznetsov Vl. V., Shevyakova N. I. Proline under stress: biological role, metabolism, regulation. Fiziologiya rastenii [Plant physiology], 1999, vol. 46, pp. 321-336 (in Russian).

13. Kishor P. V. K., Sangam S., Amrutha R. N., Laxmi P. S., Naidu K. R., Rao K. R. S. S., Rao S., Reddy K. J., Theriappan P., Sreenivasulu N. Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implication in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Current Science, 2005, vol. 88, pp. 424-438.

14. Foyer C. H., Lelandais M., Kunert K. J. Photooxidative stress in plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 1994, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 696-717. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1994.920422.x

15. Meneguzzo S., Navari-Izzo F., Izzo R. Antioxidative responses of shoots and roots of wheat to increasing NaCl concentrations. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1999, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 274-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0176-1617(99)80019-4

16. Polesskaya O. G., Kashirina E. K., Alekhina N. D. The influence of salt stress on the antioxidant system of plants depending on the conditions of nitrogen nutrition. Fiziologiya rastenii [Plant physiology], 2006, vol. 53, pp. 207-214 (in Russian).

17. Yaronskaya E. B., Vershilovskaya I. V., Averina N. G. The content of zeatin and its derivatives in seedlings of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with an elevated level of 5-aminolevulinic acid. Vestsi Natsyyanal’nai akademii navukBelarusi. Seryya biyalagichnykh navuk = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Biological series, 2004, no. 3, pp. 70-73 (in Russian).

18. Averina N. G., Yaronskaya E. B. Biosynthesis of tetrapyrroles in plants. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2012. 413 p. (in Russian).

19. Averina N. G., Gritskevich E. R. Mechanisms of resistance of barley plants to salt stress under the action of 5-aminolevulinic acid. Fiziologiya rastenii [Plant physiology], 2010, vol. 57, pp. 849-846 (in Russian).

20. Averina N. G., Beizai Z., Shcherbakov R. A. Molecular mechanisms of nitrate reductase regulation by exogenous 5-aminolevulinic acid in barley seedlings grown under saline conditions with sodium chloride. Doklady Natsyyanal’nai akademii nauk Belarusi = Doklady of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 2015, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 95-101 (in Russian).

21. Averina N. G., Beizai Z., Shcherbakov R. A., Usatov A. V. The role of nitrogen metabolism in the formation of salt tolerance of barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Fiziologiya rastenii [Plant physiology], 2014, vol. 61, pp. 106-113 (in Russian).


Review

Views: 483


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-8940 (Print)
ISSN 2524-230X (Online)