Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Biological Series

Advanced search

SELECTION OF BUTANOL-RESISTANT MUTANTS OF CLOSTRIDIUM ACETOBUTYLICUM S1

Abstract

Conditions were optimized for chemical mutagenesis of bacteria C. acetobutylicum S1. It was shown that treatment of bacterial culture pre-grown for 8 hours in standard synthetic MSS medium, with N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine at concentration 50 μg/ml in citrate buffer (pH = 5.5) during 60 min at 25 °C allowed to select mutantvariants stably inheriting the trait of resistance to 2.5 % butanol. Analysis of fatty acid composition of cytoplasmic membrane has revealed presence of 2-hexylcyclopropane octanoic acid in mutant distinguished by elevated butanol production.

About the Authors

E. V. Bolotnik
Institute of Microbiology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Ph. D. (Biol.), Deputy Director


A. A. Chereshnev
Belarusian State University
Belarus
Graduate student


M. A. Titok
Institute of Microbiology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
D. Sc. (Biol.), Professor, Chief researcher


E. I. Kolomiets
State Scientific-Production Association “Chemical Synthesis and Biotechnology” Institute of Microbiology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Corresponding Member, D. Sc. (Biol.), General Director of State Scientific-Production Association “Chemical Synthesis and Biotechnology” – Director of Institute of Microbiology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus


References

1. Szulczyk, K. R. (2010), “Which is a better transportation fuel – butanol or ethanol”, International Journal of Energy Environment, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 501–512.

2. Bowles, L. K. and Ellefson, W. L. (1985), “Effects of butanol on Clostridium acetobutylicum”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1165–1170.

3. Nicolaou, S. A., Gaida, S. M. and Papoutsakis, E. T. (2010), “A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bioprocessing: from biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation”, Metabolic Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 307–331.

4. Moreira, A. R., Ulmer D. C. and Linden, J. C. (1981), “Butanol toxicity in the butylic fermentation”, Biotechnology Bioengineering Symposium, vol. 11, pp. 567–579.

5. Maddy, A. (1979), “Biochemical analysis of membranes”, Mir, Мoscow, RU.

6. Ezeji, T., Milne, C., Price, N. D. and Blaschek, H. P. (2010), “Achievements and perspectives to overcome the poor solvent resistance in acetone and butanol-producing microorganisms”, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1697–1712.

7. Balotnik, A., Litvinovich N. E., Kirpicheva T. E., Kolomiets E. I. and Titok, M. A. (2015), “Investigation of factors determining stress resistance of solventogenic bacteriae strain Clostridium acetobutylicum derived by adaptive selection method”, 6th Congress of European Microbiologists (FEMS Congress), Maastricht, AN, 7–11 June 2015, p. 2302.

8. Mandell, J. D. and Greenberg, J. A. (1960), “Genetic effects of N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in Neurospora”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 3, pp. 575–577.

9. Bowring, S. N. and Morris, J. G. (1985), “Mutagenesis of Clostridium acetobutylicum”, Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 58, pp. 577–584.

10. Adelberg, E. A., Mandel, M. and Chen, G. C. C. (1965), “Optimal conditions for mutagenesis by N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in Escherichia coli K12”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication, vol. 18, pp. 788–795.

11. Mucha, Jeanette M. (2013), Salt selection of microbial mutants to increase bioproduct tolerance, titer, or osmotic shock tolerance, USA: IPC C12P1/04, C12Q1/02, C12N1/20, C12P21/06, Pat. US8372598 B2.

12. Vollherbst-Schneck, K., Sands, J. A. and Montenecourt, B. S. (1984), “Effect of butanol on lipid composition and fluidity of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824”, Applied Environmental and Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 193–194.

13. Grogan, D. W. and Cronan, J. E. Jr. (1997), “Cyclopropane ring formation in membrane lipids of bacteria”, Micro- biology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 429–441.


Review

Views: 736


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-8940 (Print)
ISSN 2524-230X (Online)